Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johnson v. Clark
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Armond Johnson
Defendant:
J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation, City of Obetz Police Department, Franklin County, Ohio Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey et al v. Lanos et al
as 3:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
Luna LaToya Bey and Aladdin Moroc Bey
Defendant:
Karen Lanos, A'senah Taylor, Danielle Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sherman v. Biglari et al
as 1:2018cv02887
Plaintiff:
Charna E Sherman
Defendant:
Sandeep Savla, Latham & Watkins, LLP, Christopher J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corrin v. C & J Clark Retail, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv01855
Defendant:
C & J Clark Retail, Inc. and Rob Parks
Plaintiff:
Joshua Corrin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Clarke v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00978
Plaintiff:
Katlin J. Clarke
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP v. 3.2 ACRES PERMANENT EASEMENT, AND 4.2 ACRES TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF LAND IN COLERAIN TOWNSHIP, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO et al
as 2:2014cv02650
Defendant:
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD, Linda K. Kessler Living Trust, Tri-Star Energy Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02612
Plaintiff:
Loretta J. Clark
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01754
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Clark
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
