Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Daniels v. State of Florida
as 0:2026cv62068
Plaintiff:
Roy O. Daniels
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02439
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
O'CONNOR v. EAGLE PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
as 2:2026cv09501
Plaintiff:
Daniel OConnor
Defendant:
Eagle Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Herring v. Groom, et al.
as 3:2026cv00732
Plaintiff:
Daniel Luke Herring
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Groom, Dr. Unknown Robinson, Doe Nurse 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weste v. USA
as 5:2026cv04851
Defendant:
Steven Daniel Weste
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01328
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zenor v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00067
Plaintiff:
Danielle Zenor
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC, Firstnet Authority, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Clinton v. Brouillard et al
as 1:2026cv00510
Defendant:
Chubb Ltd., Esq. Stephen Brouillard, Esq. Todd Romano and others
Plaintiff:
Judith Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABC IP, LLC, et al. v. Quick Response Firearms, LLC, et al.
as 4:2026cv00944
Plaintiff:
ABC IP LLC and Rare Breed Triggers, Inc.
Defendant:
Quick Response Firearms, LLC, Daniel Corsini and Jerried Brown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04323
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
