Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Suprabha Bhat v. Third Avenue Management LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00904
Defendant:
Jack W. Aber, David M. Barse, Michael Buono and others
Plaintiff:
Suprabha Bhat
Scott Matthews v. Third Avenue Management LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00770
Defendant:
Jack W. Aber, David M. Barse, Michael Buono and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthews
Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc. v. Third Avenue Trust et al
as 2:2016cv00736
Defendant:
David M. Barse, William E. Chapman, II, Vincent J. Dugan and others
Plaintiff:
Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc.
Loi Tran v. Third Avenue Management LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00602
Defendant:
Jack W. Aber, David M. Barse, Michael Buono and others
Plaintiff:
Loi Tran
Brisman v. Graham et al
as 9:2015cv00712
Plaintiff:
Jason Brisman
Defendant:
Harold D. Graham, Quinn, Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Miccuci et al
as 9:2014cv00658
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
G. Miccuci, Boyd, Fagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Dugan v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 14-55841
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TROY J. DUGAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Defendant - Appellant:
BRETT BINDER, Deputy, JOHN STANLEY, Sgt. and CHRISTOPHER NANCE, Deputy, AKA Nance
Troy Dugan v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 14-55516
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TROY J. DUGAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NANCE, Deputy, AKA Nance, BRETT BINDER, Deputy and JOHN STANLEY, Sgt.
Troy Dugan v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 14-55103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TROY J. DUGAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NANCE, Deputy, BRETT BINDER, Deputy and JOHN STANLEY, Sgt.
LaCroix et al v. City of Portsmouth, Virginia
as 2:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
Robert LaCroix , Neil Begley , Myles W. Bostic, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Portsmouth, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
