Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Grohoske v. Lopez
as 22-50450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Lester Grohoske
Defendant / Appellee:
Sherriff Joe Lopez, Falls County DA Kathryn J. Gilliam, Christy Wideman and others
Grohoske et al v. Lopez et al
as 6:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
David Lester Grohoske, Roy Lester Grohoske and Diann Hazlewood Grohoske
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lopez, Falls County DA Kathryn J. Gilliam, Christy Wideman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7246
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. RIVERO, I. O. HARRIS, J. ELY and others
Defendant:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6643
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, J. ELY, D. BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7846
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, J. ELY, D. BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
GILLIAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv04290
Defendant:
AERO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. GILLIAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03193
Plaintiff:
PHILIP CALLIGAN, ASHLEY RIVERA, JAMES P. MCCOOL and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
