Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ramales et al v. Signature Cleaning Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02863
Plaintiff:
Alejandra Ramales, Laura Rodriguez, Jacinta Andrade and others
Defendant:
Signature Cleaning Services, Inc., American Maintenance 3 Janitorial Services and Supplies Co. Corp. and Andrew Weisbach
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hernandez v. Spano et al
as 9:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Eryn J. Hernandez
Defendant:
J. Spano, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Spano et al
as 1:2021cv11112
Plaintiff:
Eryn J. Hernandez
Defendant:
J. Spano, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. BMNY Contracting Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv09375
Plaintiff:
Mario J. Hernandez
Defendant:
BMNY Contracting Corp., BMNY Construction Corp. and Benedetto Cupo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Thompson v. Sharp et al
as 3:2015cv00702
Plaintiff:
Demar Thompson
Defendant:
Phillip Sharp , J. Hernandez , A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez Tino et al v. Argyle Tavern, Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv03953
Defendant:
Argyle Tavern, Inc., Babylon Restaurant Group, Inc., Gregory Bartolotta and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rigoberto Castellon and Odoniel J. Hernandez Tino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rogers v. Rosenberg Diamond
as 14-2295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddy Antonio Rogers
Defendant - Appellee:
Rosenberg Diamond and David J. Hernandez and Associates
Rogers v. Rosenberg Diamond et al
as 1:2013cv07011
Plaintiff:
Eddy Antonio Rogers
Defendant:
Rosenberg Diamond and David J. Hernandez and Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. Flying Food Group, LLC
as 1:2012cv08962
Plaintiff:
Maria J. Hernandez
Defendant:
Flying Food Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
