Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Thomas v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Deuntae Thomas
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Thomas J Marshall, USPS Consumer and Industry Contact Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lara et al v. Backus et al
as 1:2019cv01086
Plaintiff:
Eleftherios Koutsogiannis, Rosa Santiago, Cesar Lara and others
Defendant:
Trooper Nathaniel C. Lunt (#6071), Trooper Thomas J. Marshall (#6073), Trooper Dennis T. Kranc (#5014) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Marshall vs. Port Allen Police Department, et al
as 3:2018cv00649
Defendant:
Esdron Brown, City of Port Allen and Port Allen Police Department
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KENNEDY v. HANNA et al
as 5:2018cv00977
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
JOSEPH N. HANNA, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. MULDOWNEY et al
as 5:2017cv04599
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
JAMES T. MULDOWNEY, STEPHEN J. MARSHALL, JAMES K. REILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Serrano v. Hull et al
as 1:2017cv00847
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Serrano
Defendant:
Gregory Hull, M. Campos and J. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
