Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kevin Pitts v. State of South Carolina
as 23-6532
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ANDERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MINDY HERVEY, Solicitor individual and official capacity and others
Martin et al v. Stowe et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Martin, J. M. and Christopher James Martin
Defendant:
Heather Stowe, Kathleen Rust Bell and Byron Rashard Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinkfield v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00149
Defendant:
J. Brown, J. Bowles, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pitts v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2020cv00092
Defendant:
J Carpenter, Charles Whiten, State of South Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00501
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Christopher J. Martin v. Harold W. Clarke
as 15-6702
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Jones v. District of Columbia Superior Court et al
as 1:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
District of Columbia Superior Court, United States District Courts in Virginia, Spotsylvania County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owaiian Jones v. J. Martin Ba
as 14-7804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MARTIN BASS, ERIC L. OLSEN, GEORGE E. SASSER and others
Jones v. Bass et al
as 1:2014cv01580
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
J. Martin Bass, Eric L. Olsen, George E. Sasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Clarke
as 1:2014cv01425
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Martin
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
