Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Latham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023at00021
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, C. Filipello, E. Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ortiz v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2020cv00217
Defendant:
C. Downey, County of San Joaquin, J. Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2020at00094
Defendant:
C. DOWNEY, County of San Joaquin, J. MENDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Mendez-Nunez et al
as 3:2019cv01955
Defendant:
Orlando Pagan-Ramirez and Carlos J. Mendez-Nunez
Plaintiff:
Omayra Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Humanistas Seculares de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Camara de Representantes et al
as 3:2017cv01298
Plaintiff:
Humanistas Seculares de Puerto Rico, Inc.
Defendant:
Camara de Representantes, Carlos J. Mendez-Nunez and Jose Torres-Samora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
