Cases 1 - 7 of 7
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
Tomsheck v. The Town of Long Beach et al
as 3:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tomsheck
Defendant:
Town of Long Beach, The , Peter Byvoets , Jane Starr Neulieb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STUDY v. MEYER et al
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN STUDY
Defendant:
TODD J. MEYER, KEN CAMPBELL, MATTHEW C. KINCAID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. GLAZING CONCEPTS GLASS COMPANY, INC.
as 3:2012mc00003
Defendant:
GLAZING CONCEPTS GLASS COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, GARY J. MEYERS and PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION INITIATIVE
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Classic Construction Services LLC
as 4:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund , Gary J Meyers and Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Initiative
Defendant:
Classic Construction Services LLC
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the et al v. Top Quality Glass & Mirror Co Inc
as 4:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the, International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, Gary J Meyers and others
Defendant:
Top Quality Glass & Mirror Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. THOMAS
as 1:2007cv00854
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and GARY J. MEYERS
Defendant:
CHARLES D. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
