Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Robinson v. Washington County Board of Education et al
as 1:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Latisha Robinson
Defendant:
Washington County Board of Education, Boyd J Michael, III, Dana Peake and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Epps v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, Warden Walter West and Officer Whitington
Plaintiff:
Antoine Epps
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moyd v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2019cv01356
Plaintiff:
Antwan Moyd
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, State of Maryland, Officer Bowders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. State of Maryland et al.
as 1:2019cv01335
Defendant:
Allen Gang, J. Michael Stouffer, State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tetlow v. Hogan et al
as 8:2019cv00356
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, Stephen Moyer, Pat Goines-Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Lynn Tetlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tarpley v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2017cv03455
Plaintiff:
Steven Tarpley
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, David Sipes, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarpley v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2017cv02961
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Tarpley
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, David Sipes, Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgeford v. DPSCS ADA Coordinator et al
as 8:2017cv02480
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Defendant:
DPSCS ADA Coordinator, Sec. of State Moyer and Dupty Sec J. Michael Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis v. Wolford et al
as 1:2017cv02409
Plaintiff:
John Earl Artis
Defendant:
Jermey W. Wolford, James A. Strope, Frank B. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03235
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
