Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Moreno et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12010
Plaintiff:
Divina Nunez, Madeleine Netrosio, Michael E Murphy and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
MURRAY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11822
Plaintiff:
GLORIA J MURRAY and ANTHONY J MURRAY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
as 2:2017cv14245
Plaintiff:
Peggy J Murray
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Parker Line Striping, Inc. and AMS Asphalt Maintenance Systems, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 1:2017cv22352
Plaintiff:
Francis J. Murray
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 4:2017cv01176
Plaintiff:
James J Murray
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Murray v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01729
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J. Murray
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00807
Plaintiff:
Katherine J. Murray and Sandy Murray
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01218
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Murray
Defendant:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32417
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Murray
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray et al v. Ethicon, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv27204
Plaintiff:
Joyce W. Murray and Willie J. Murray
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
