Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WALKER v. SELLERS et al
as 2:2021cv00660
Defendant:
DEREK WHITE, PAMELA SELLERS, MR. J. PETERS and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARREN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
SUSAN CONINE, DOUG YUHOUSE, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEFF v. PKS HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01826
Plaintiff:
TONI CAIAZZO NEFF
Defendant:
PKS HOLDINGS, LLC, PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC., MHC SECURITIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
GARLAND v. JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE et al
as 2:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
KENDALL GARLAND
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE, CHAD MARGULIES and DAGE GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARLAND v. JJPI (JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE) et al
as 2:2015cv01225
Plaintiff:
KENDALL GARLAND
Defendant:
JJPI (JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE), CHAD and TWO PROBATION OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARLAND v. JJPI (JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE) et al
as 2:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
KENDALL GARLAND
Defendant:
JJPI (JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE) and CHAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2014cv03004
Plaintiff:
NANCY J. PETERS
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Chubbick et al
as 3:2012cv01638
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Jhyy Chubbick, John Adami, B. Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PETERS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05848
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. PETERS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42631
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND J. PETERS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
