Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Marsh v. Garrett et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Marsh
Defendant:
J. R. Garrett, A. Jordan, L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.R. v. Shafer
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Defendant:
Chad Shafer
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Cook v. Metal Partners Rebar, LLC etal
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Trinity Rebar and Concrete Supplies, LLC doing business as Trinity Promotions, J&R Holding, LLC doing business as Trinity Rebar, James R. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Dalton Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Adams et al
as 3:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Paul Adams, Department of Justice, J. R. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J. R. v. Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00142
Defendant:
The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc., John Does 1 Through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
G. L. and J. R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. R. v. Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00126
Defendant:
The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc., John Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Compton et al v. West Virginia State Police et al
as 2:2016cv09298
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Compton and Crystal Pauley
Defendant:
West Virginia State Police, Sgt. Larry G. O'Bryan, Sgt. Travis Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarol et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06127
Plaintiff:
Daisy M. Sarol and J. R. Sarol
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. City of Gilbert et al
as 2:2013cv21448
Plaintiff:
Jimmy West
Defendant:
City of Gilbert, Nathan Glanden, FNU Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
