Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(PC) Randall v. VonRader et al
as 2:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Mark Randall and Mark James Randall
Defendant:
H. VonRader, J. Robinette and T. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Durfey et al
as 2:2022cv03792
Plaintiff:
Klain Gibson
Defendant:
Officer M. Durfey, Officer J. Smith, Officer E. Fain and others
Interested Party:
ip state of ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINETTE v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. ROBINETTE
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., AUROLIFE PHARMA, LLC, ACETERIS, LLC and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanders #305405 et al v. Macauley et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405, Anthony Murphy #769317, Maurice H. Fielding #666102 and others
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Unknown Walzach, Brian Hadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Robinette et al
as 2:2015cv01928
Plaintiff:
Mark Shane Thompson
Defendant:
J. Robinette, D. Cohn, M. Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connsero v. Foulk et al
as 2:2014cv01541
Plaintiff:
Michael Connsero
Defendant:
F Foulk, Lewis, M Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Young et al
as 2:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. Williams
Defendant:
T. Young, B. Sharp, S. Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suniga v. Van Sant et al
as 2:2011cv02572
Plaintiff:
Alfred Suniga
Defendant:
J. Van Sant, R. Zamora, B. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinette v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv02141
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Robinette
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
