Cases 1 - 10 of 11
J. R. et al v. Atrium Health, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
J. R. and J. S.
Defendant:
Atrium Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
S. et al v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield et al
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
T. S. and J. S.
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield and Deloitte LLP Group Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Walker et al v. Cherokee County et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kelly Walker, Kellly Campbell, J. S. and others
Defendant:
Cherokee County, Scott Lindsay, Cindy Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Cherokee County, NC et al
as 1:2020cv00250
Plaintiff:
A. D., J. B., Da. P. and others
Defendant:
Cindy Palmer, Scott Lindsay, Lisa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
WICKS v. WALMART STORE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR et al
as 1:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WALMART STORE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR, LAMAR SKELTON, D. BRAD RIELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIMBLE v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KIMBLE
Defendant:
J. S. THOMAS and K. L. BRINDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER, LAMAR SKELTON, CONCORD POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUNDERBURK v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00675
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC DION FUNDERBURK
Defendant:
S. DICKERSON, J. S. FLOYD, J. E. SWAIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Bey et al v. Varnell et al
as 5:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
Asaru Alim Nu Tu'Pak El-Bey, Khadirah Ma'At Tu'pak El-Bey and Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World, Temple 2
Defendant:
J. S. Varnell, David Shelton, A. J. Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
