Cases 1 - 10 of 2,227
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
Reese v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00801
Petitioner:
Reginald J. Reese, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howarth v. J&M Stone & Garden LLC
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
J&M Stone & Garden LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Asfazadour v. Chuck's Trucks, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Paul Asfazadour
Defendant:
Chuck's Trucks, LLC and Charles J. Mantiglia, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hazard v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hazard
Defendant:
Semple, J. Dzurenda, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Simon J Cooper
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
U.S. Bank National Association v. O'Hara et al
as 3:2024cv00657
Defendant:
Francis O'Hara, Francis G. O, Edward J. O'Hara and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Thomas v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Demetrius J. Thomas
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
