Cases 41 - 50 of 312
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00952
Plaintiff:
Lashonda J. Wright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(PC) McDowell v. Flores et al
as 1:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dewitt McDowell
Defendant:
R. Flores, V. Barboza, A. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
as 1:2021cv00726
Petitioner:
Benjamin J. Wright
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kessing v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Derick C Kessing
Defendant:
Smith, P. Temple, J. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2021cv81544
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J. Wright as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Harold Brian Wright and Rebecca J. Wright
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. North Central Correctional Complex
as 2:2021cv04232
Plaintiff:
Vincent J. Wright
Defendant:
North Central Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyde-Rhodes v. Withers et al
as 4:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Defendant:
Mark Withers, Dave Johnson, John Stosich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Turner
as 3:2021cv01477
Petitioner:
Benjamin J. Wright
Respondent:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen Hammler v. J. Wright
as 21-15881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN HAMMLER
Defendant / Appellee:
J. WRIGHT
MICHAEL J. WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv02255
Defendant:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
