Cases 1 - 10 of 383
J.C. v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
, an individual J.C.
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriff's Department, County of Riverside, a public entity, Sheriff Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Chavez v. Brownsville ISD
as 23-40640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Martha Chavez, as next friend for J.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Victor Villarreal and Brownsville Independent School District
Carrasco et al v. City of Joliet et al
as 1:2023cv15572
Plaintiff:
Adela Carrasco, Eric Raya, Kiera Martinez and others
Defendant:
City of Joliet, A. Adams, Lawrence Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
J.C. v. DUVERNA et al
as 1:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
SHERINA BROWN and J.C.
Defendant:
JAMSLY DUVERNA, JOHN DOES 1-10 and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
