Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 89
MCINTOSH v. BELL
as 2:2019cv00068
Petitioner: DANNYE T. MCINTOSH
Respondent: J.R. BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BENDZEN et al v. THOMAS et al
as 3:2019cv00017
Defendant: D.E. Deeg, W.R. Arbaugh, Nathan Hassler and others
Plaintiff: Lawrence Bendzen, Linda Bendzen, LINDA A. BENDZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLEDGE v. BELL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00034
Petitioner: TOMMY LEE RUTLEDGE
Respondent: J.R. BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grimmage v. Schuyler County et al
as 4:2019cv04001
Defendant: Schuyler County, Shane Jumper, J.R. Reid and others
Plaintiff: Jerome L Grimmage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson et al v. Polk et al
as 1:2018cv07172
Plaintiff: Trequan Odum, Sheronda Odum, Cornesha Dawson and others
Defendant: LeRoy K Martin, Kimberly Foxx, Corey Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Woods v. Hines V.A. Hospital Doctors et al
as 1:2018cv06302
Plaintiff: J.R. DeVere Woods
Defendant: Hines V.A. Hospital Doctors and Resident & Unknown Dentist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATFORD v. BELL
as 2:2018cv00325
Petitioner: KENNETH W. WATFORD
Respondent: J.R. BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARCIA-ACOSTA v. BELL
as 2:2018cv00293
Respondent: J.R. BELL
Petitioner: JESUS GARCIA-ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Betzner et al v. The Boeing Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01294
Plaintiff: Bruce Betzner and Barbara Betzner
Defendant: The Boeing Company , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CASON v. BELL
as 2:2018cv00273
Respondent: J.R. BELL
Petitioner: RAY LEE CASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?