Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LIA Network v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
LIA Network
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Randall H. Erben, Chris Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Institute for Free Speech v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Institute for Free Speech
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Mary Kennedy, Chris Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Institute for Free Speech v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Institute for Free Speech
Defendant:
Executive Director J.R. Johnson, Commissioner Mary Kennedy, Commisioner Chris Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salinas v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01371
Plaintiff:
Orlando Salinas
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Mary K. Kennedy, Randall H. Erben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruce et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce, Bryan Slaton and Grayson County Conservatives PAC
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Mary K.(Katie) Kennedy, Randall H. Erben and others
Intervenor:
Honorable Green Charlie and Honorable Dustin Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orbital Engineering, Inc. v. J.R. Johnson Engineering, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Orbital Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amaro v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Eric Amaro
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Robert Coupe, Neal Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pancoatl et al v. Burkoff et al
as 3:2013cv00548
Defendant:
Phillip Burkoff, J.R. Johnson Inc. and Andrew Johnson
Plaintiff:
Apolinar Pancoatl, Sergio Pancoatl and Ulises Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Hendricks v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00756
Petitioner:
Michael A. Hendricks
Respondent:
J.R. Johnson and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
