Cases 1 - 7 of 7
AAAG California v. Kisana, et al
as 20-4034
Defendant / Appellant:
SPECIALIZED SALES AND LEASING, ABDUL KISANA and LUXURY AUTO GROUP
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Defendant:
JACK METCALF
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AAAG CALIFORNIA
AAAG California v. Kisana, et al
as 20-4018
Defendant / Appellant:
SPECIALIZED SALES AND LEASING, ABDUL KISANA and LUXURY AUTO GROUP
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Defendant:
JACK METCALF
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AAAG CALIFORNIA
AAAG California v. Kisana et al
as 2:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Jack Metcalf, Abdul R. Kisana, Luxury Auto Group and others
Plaintiff:
AAAG California
Receiver:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kailin et al v. Metcalf et al
as 1:2019cv04703
Defendant:
Jack Metcalf, City of Gurnee and Unidentified Officers
Plaintiff:
Steven Kailin, Ethan Kailin and E.K.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Metcalf et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jack Metcalf and Sandra Metcalf
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd , Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METCALF, et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, et al
as 1:2011cv00854
Plaintiff:
JACK METCALF and SANDRA METCALF
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell, Tom, et al v. Clinton, William J.
as 99-5214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tom Campbell, Member, U.S. House of Representatives, Dennis Kucinich, Member, U.S. House of Representatives, Bob Barr, Member, U.S. House of Representatives and others
Defendant - Appellee:
William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States
Terminated Party:
Erwin Chemerinsky, Gene R. Nichol, Jr. and Margaret M. Russell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
