Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Muhammad v. Florence County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 5:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Muhammad, Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad and James Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Florence County Sheriff's Dept, Florence County Detention Ctr and Ofc Ms McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
James Michael Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Muhammad v. Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
as 4:2023cv05961
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad and James Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, Unknown Federal Agent and Horry County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00706
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00666
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00511
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2022cv81488
Petitioner:
James Robert Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2020cv02407
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Garrius Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. USA
as 5:2020cv00288
Petitioner:
James Eugene Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
