Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. James Peters, Jr.
as 19-5792
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES RUSSELL PETERS, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rising Tide I, LLC et al v. Fitzsimmons et al
as 3:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Rising Tide I, LLC and Rising Tide II, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Fitzsimmons , Peter Lai , Chris G. Power and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Abdo et al v. Fitzsimmons et al
as 3:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
John E. Abdo
Defendant:
Michael Fitzsimmons, Peter Lai, Christopher G. Power and others
Miscellaneou:
Rising Tide I, LLC and Rising Tide II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
TAY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00802
Plaintiff:
TAY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MARISSA PISARICK, RANDOLPH NAOMI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
USA v. James Peter
as 14-2948
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES A. PETERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2012cv81037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fossen, et al v. Tyco International, Ltd., et al
as 11-1258
Plaintiff:
ERISA, LIONEL I. BRAZEN, ROBERT BOVIT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY C. VAN FOSSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TYCO INTL. LTD., MARK A. BELNICK, MARK H. SWARTZ and others
Defendant:
EDWARD D. BREEN, DAVID J. FITZPATRICK, JOHN A. KROL, Current Board of Directors and others
Interested Party:
BANK OF AMERICA/EVERCORE TRUST COMPANY, DMD JOEL P. DOUGLAS, CHARLES L. GLASS and others
Brooks et al v. Burg et al
as 1:2010cv02031
Plaintiff:
Gail Brooks , Victor F. Vaicius , Ronald N. Ulrich and others
Defendant:
James (I) Peter Burg, James Peter Burg, Suzanne (I) M. Cardin Burg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
