Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified: AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant: ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
USA v. James Smith
as 24-10866
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES EUGENE SMITH
US v. Michael Harriot
as 24-6181
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
Feimann et al v. County of Clinton et al
as NYN/8:24-CV-00257
Plaintiff: Feimann, Ronald Feimann, Gary Francis Whitney, Jr and others
Defendant: County of Clinton and Kimberly Davis
Smith v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff: James Richard Smith, III
Defendant: Colm F. Connolly, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
James SmithIn re: James Smith
as 24-1103
Petitioner: In re: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Smith, III
as 24-1192
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES RICHARD SMITH, III
USA v. James Smith
as 23-1546
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Christian Ministerial Alliance et al v. Thurston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00471
Plaintiff: Christian Ministerial Alliance, Patricia Brewer, Carolyn Briggs and others
Defendant: John Thurston, Sharon Brooks, James Harmon Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00960
Lead Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?