Cases 1 - 10 of 18
HOWARD v. MOHR et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
SPRATT HOWARD
Defendant:
MONTY MOHR, WILLIAM C BUSHNELL, JOHN A PURSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. STEPHENS et al
as 5:2021cv00396
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR SMITH
Defendant:
OFFICER STEPHENS, WARDEN IVY, DEXTER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. HEAD et al
as 5:2020cv00354
Defendant:
LISA FOUNTAIN, JAMES DEMETRIUS SMITH, SARAH BARBER and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
as 4:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
JAMES K SMITH, CURTIS MCQUINN, GAYMON SAMPSON and others
Defendant:
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
REID v. LAWSON, et al.
as 5:2020cv00077
Defendant:
GARY USRY, RENE MATHEW, BILL MASSEE and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00473
Defendant:
STATE CHAPLAIN JOHN DOE, THE STATE OF GEORGIA, JAMES D SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00238
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR JAMES D SMITH, SERGEANT WHITEHEAD, WARDEN KEVIN SPRAYBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUGAR VALLEY CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC v. SAFE HARBOR EQUITY DISTRESSED DEBT FUND 1 LP et al
as 3:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
SUGAR VALLEY CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
Defendant:
UMB BANK NA and SAFE HARBOR EQUITY DISTRESSED DEBT FUND 1 LP
Special Master:
JUDGE JAMES P SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
GHOLSTON v. POWELL et al
as 5:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant:
WILLIAM POWELL, JAMES D SMITH and MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
