Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Hardy et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Hardy , Michael Anthoney Bales , Justine David Ricks and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Sally Quillian Yates
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Robert Cole v. TN, et al
as 14-6380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT EARL COLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ADA Claim Only, CHARLES TRAUGHBER, YUSEF HAKEEM and others
Glen Clayborn v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 13-5352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLEN CLAYBORN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, CHARLES TRAUGHBER, Chairman of the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, JAMES AUSTIN, Parole Board Member and others
Eddie Pittman v. James Austin Co, et al
as 12-3730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE LAREECE PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE and JAMES AUSTIN CO
Cole v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Cole
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Charles Traughber, Yusef A. Hakeem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PITTMAN v. BOB et al
as 2:2011cv00842
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LAREECE PITTMAN
Defendant:
BOB and JAMES AUSTIN CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayborn v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02137
Plaintiff:
Glen Clayborn
Defendant:
State of Tennessee , Charles Traughber , James Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Austin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01390
Plaintiff:
James Austin
Shield #5210:
Policie Officer Theus Davis
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does 1-4 and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
