Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Dillard v. Davis
as 24-10006
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden and others
BULLARD v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03644
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD, JR.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dillard v. Davis
as 22-10791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Andrea B. Lozada, former Assistant Warden and others
Falcon Healthcare, Inc. et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Falcon Healthcare, Inc., Brownwood Hospice LP, Great Plains Hospice LP and others
Defendant:
James Bullard and Interim Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Interim Healthcare, Inc. v. DURBIN et al
as 0:2021cv62560
Plaintiff:
Interim Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
J. BRANDON DURBIN, JAMES BULLARD, JENNIFER BULLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Interim Healthcare, Inc. v. Durbin et al
as 0:2021cv62561
Plaintiff:
Interim Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
J. BRANDON DURBIN, JAMES BULLARD, JENNIFER BULLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Millsaps v. Bullard
as 5:2021cv00180
Petitioner:
Shyheim Fitzhugh Millsaps
Respondent:
James Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Millsaps v. Bullard
as 5:2021hc02247
Petitioner:
Shyheim Fitzhugh Millsaps
Respondent:
James Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv05158
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, DEPUTY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLARD v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05969
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
