Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Phillips v. AVCO Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv04575
Plaintiff:
James Edward Phillips
Defendant:
AVCO Corporation, AGCO Corporation, New Idea Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. James Phillips
as 22-4398
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARDS PHILLIPS, a/k/a James Edward Phillips
Phillips v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00638
Petitioner:
James Edward Phillips, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Phillips v. Burgos
as 2:2021cv00089
Petitioner:
James Edward Phillups and James Edward Phillips
Respondent:
Acting Warden Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PHILLIPS v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS and JAMES EDWARD PHILLIPS
Defendant:
C Allen, C. LLOYD, REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Pendleton Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
James E Phillips and James Edward Phillips
Defendant:
C Allen, Reagal, Pendleton Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Phillips, III
as 21-10291
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD PHILLIPS, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Phillips, III
as 19-14075
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD PHILLIPS, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Phillips v. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 4:2012cv10076
Plaintiff:
James Edward Phillips
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center, Tommy Taylor, Aramark Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 4:2012cv10073
Plaintiff:
James Edward Phillips
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center, Tommy Taylor, Kendell Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
