Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HART v. ARCHER et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Defendant:
JUSTICE JENNIFER ARCHER, KATHERINE HUDSON-MACRAE, LINDA MASON and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICHOLAS GAGNON and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Riggs et al
as 3:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Hart
Defendant:
Jane & John Does and Sgt. Riggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Holston v. Hart et al
as 2:2019cv00795
Defendant:
Sacramento City Police Department and James Hart
Plaintiff:
James Clarence Holston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald v. Melendez
as 1:2012cv10453
Plaintiff:
Stanley Donald
Defendant:
Luis Melendez, James Hart, Kenneth Arsenult and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Toliver v. Public Agency The Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 2:2011cv00810
Defendant:
Noreen Blonin, Noreen Blonin, Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Toliver
Stern v. Dunn et al
as 3:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
James Hart Stern
Defendant:
Barbara Dunn, Hinds County and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jardine et al v. Graham et al
as 2:2009cv01114
Plaintiff:
Jamie D Jardine and Erick Darrington
Defendant:
Alfonso Graham, James Hart, Jayne Hackbarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crouthers v. GREER et al
as 3:2007cv00655
Plaintiff:
Lee Crouthers
Defendant:
JAMES GREER, DICK VERHAGEN, James Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
