Cases 11 - 20 of 133
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11346
Plaintiff:
JAMES HICKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08933
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JAMES HICKS, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Hicks v. Michael Yeh, et al
as 23-15486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES HICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL YEH, Doctor, NAY AUNG, M.D., S. ROBERTS, Chief Medical Executive and others
HICKS v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv20326
Plaintiff:
JAMES HICKS
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06450
Plaintiff:
James Hicks
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Hicks v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11136
Plaintiff:
James Hicks
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Domroes v. White et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roger Domroes
Defendant:
Julie White, Bryan Hilton, G.S. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Allen Washam v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv01972
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Washam
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Correctional Officer Langley, Correctional Officer Guttierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
