Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Earl v. Montgomery County Jail
as 4:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
James Jordan Earl
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. ALL STAR AUTO et al
as 1:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN
Defendant:
ALL STAR AUTO and ARIF AYUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JORDAN v. TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN
Defendant:
TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. JACKSON PARISH SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv03842
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN, IV
Defendant:
JACKSON PARISH SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jordan v United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv05429
Plaintiff:
James Jordan
Not Classified By Court:
United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barken v. Sarenac et al
as 2:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Regina Barken
Defendant:
Michael Sarenac, Kent Gordon and James Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN et al v. LINDBERG
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN, CBS INSURANCE, INC., EMPLOYERS FIRST CHOICE INSURANCE SERVICES INC. and others
Defendant:
GREG E. LINDBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jordan v. Hughes et al
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Jordan and Austin Jordan
Defendant:
K. Hughes, Officer Farmer and Fayette County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
