Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 226
Spirdione v. WASHINGTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv11018
Plaintiff: Nicolas Spirdione and Nicholas Spirdione
Defendant: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Richard D. Russell, Noah Nagy and others
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05622
Plaintiff: JAMES KING
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04114
Plaintiff: JAMES KING
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Eddie James King
as 22-10365
Petitioner: In re: EDDIE JAMES KING
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Lee v King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00013
Plaintiff: Antonio Sentelle Lee
Defendant: James King, Robert Edwards and Brian Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddie King v. Lawson
as 21-14492
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant / Appellee: LAWSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alvin Frazier v. Amy Coffelt, et al
as 21-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee: AMY COFFELT, Food Service Supervisor, KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden, D. SMITH, Deputy Warden and others
KING v. SMITH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00128
Petitioner: EDDIE JAMES KING
Respondent: Warden AIMEE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Russell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00371
Petitioner: Phillip James King
Respondent: Perry Russell and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?