Cases 1 - 10 of 36
James Mosley v. Ripley County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 22-2722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, RYAN KING and others
Mosley v. Langford et al
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
James L. Mosley
Defendant:
Robert Langford, Daniel Albergts and Valerie Adair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosley v. Jay County Sheriffs Dept
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
James L Mosley
Defendant:
Jay County Sheriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Mosley v. Ripley County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 21-2340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and BOB CURL, Jail Commander
MOSLEY v. REAVES et al
as 1:2021cv02058
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MOSLEY
Respondent:
ANGELA REAVES and RYAN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 4:2021cv00011
Defendant:
BOB CURL, JEFF CUMBERWORTH, RIPLEY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51861
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES C MOSLEY JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57366
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES C MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers v. Paxton et al
as 2:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Wendell Wayne Chambers
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Charles E Roy, Dale Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
