Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LEWIS v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2023cv03652
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LEWIS v. SPEEDWAY, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01833
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY, LLC, SPEEDWAY, LLC (STORE -0006796) and SHIELDS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Rich Grossi Snow Removal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EYAJAN v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant:
KIM KOSKI, GERALD L. HEINBAUGH, MARY SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LEWIS v. YOST
as 3:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN YOST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. LEWIS
as 2:2011cv01747
Plaintiff:
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION
Defendant:
JAMES LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADDOCK v. FIBREBOARD CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv74284
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS BRADDOCK
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS et al v. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv73935
Plaintiff:
YVONNE LEWIS, GINA LEWIS and JAMES LEWIS
Defendant:
BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv73630
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS and LENA LEWIS
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEWIS et al v. AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv63295
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEWIS and LYDIA LEWIS
Defendant:
AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION, ADVOCATE MINES, ASBERIT S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
