Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Turner III v. John Doe
as 1:2023cv09516
Plaintiff:
James R. Turner III
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Turner, Jr.In re: James Turner, Jr.
as 23-1908
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES R. TURNER, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Turner v. Federal Aviation Administratio
as 22-295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James R. Turner
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Aviation Administration, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and FJC Security Services, Inc.
James Turner, Jr. v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 21-2735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. TURNER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
James Turner v. City of Racine, et al
as 21-2451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RACINE, COUNTY OF RACINE, EMILY BRUNO and others
TURNER, JR. v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2020cv00197
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY, KEVIN J. RANSOM and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
Petitioner:
JAMES R. TURNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner, Jr. v. Ransom et al
as 1:2020cv00213
Petitioner:
James R. Turner, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin J. Ransom and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Turner v. Reed Richardson
as 19-1114
Respondent / Appellee:
REED A. RICHARDSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES R. TURNER
TURNER v. PUDIK
as 2:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. TURNER
Defendant:
RYAN PUDIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC v. 2.313 acres of land, more or less, in St. Lucie County, Florida et al
as 2:2016cv14085
Plaintiff:
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC
Defendant:
2.313 acres of land, more or less, in St. Lucie County, Florida, Alderman Holdings, LLLP and James R. Turner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
