Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thompson v. Miles
as 2:2022cv01208
Petitioner:
Sheldon James Thompson
Respondent:
Warden Eddie Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq00647
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Roy James Thompson and Charlotte Anne Thompson
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Pritzker
as 1:2020cv02583
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker and J.B.
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Thompson v. Safe Auto Insurance Group, Inc.
as 1:2019cv07841
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Safe Auto Insurance Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Thompson v. Kohl'S Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09042
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. , Capital One Finance Corporation and Merchantile Adjustment Bureau LLC
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02569
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Resnick v. Schwartz
as 1:2017cv04944
Plaintiff:
Alan Resnick , James Thompson , Associated Allergists & Asthma, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Donald Schwartz, Ronald Spitz and Ronald Spitz and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
