Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Caldwell v. Evernest LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Edward Caldwell
Defendant:
Evernest LLC, Justin Jones, Jameson Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Wilhite v. Parker et al
as 7:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Jameson T. Parker, Marcus Haynes, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Toney et al
as 4:2019cv00589
Defendant:
John Hutton, Finch, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Kendrick George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Parker et al
as 7:2018cv01300
Defendant:
Monk, E Hynes and Jameson Parker
Plaintiff:
Sheyenne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St John v. Alabaster, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2013cv02193
Plaintiff:
Joseph St John
Defendant:
Alabaster, Alabama, City of and Jameson Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Alabaster, City of, Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv03972
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Bivins Woodson
Defendant:
Alabaster, City of, Alabama , Justin Snead and Jameson Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flakes v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Clint Anthony Flakes
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Patricia Hood, Captain Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George et al v. Creditor Recovery Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv01575
Plaintiff:
Jada George, Jada George, Bradley George and others
Defendant:
Creditor Recovery Corporation, Creditmax Recoveries, LLC, Law Offices of Joseph H. Belzer, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Jameson et al v. Mustique, L.L.C.
as 1:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jameson and Frederick W. Garraway, Jr.
Defendant:
Mustique, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
