Cases 1 - 10 of 15
AUTOMATIC6ACQUISITIONS LLC v. RUMFORD et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
AUTOMATIC6ACQUISITIONS LLC
Defendant:
TOWN OF RUMFORD, ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY INC, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Chery v. Warby Parker Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv02611
Defendant:
Warby Parker Inc., Jand, Inc. and Warby Parker Retail, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Chery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. JAND, Inc.
as 22-1634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
1-800 Contacts, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAND, Inc., DBA Warby Parker
1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. JAND, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06966
Plaintiff:
1-800 Contacts, Inc.
Defendant:
JAND, Inc., d/b/a Warby Parker and JAND, Inc. doing business as Warby Parker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Raen Optics, LLC v. Jand, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00223
Defendant:
Jand, Inc. doing business as Warby Parker, a Delaware corporation and Jand, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Warby Parker, a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff:
Raen Optics, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Jand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lennon Image Technologies, LLC v. JAND, Inc. d/b/a Warby Parker
as 2:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lennon Image Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
JAND, Inc. d/b/a Warby Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Epic IP LLC v. JAND, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00881
Plaintiff:
Epic IP LLC
Defendant:
JAND, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
