Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gould et al v. Shapiro
as 1:2026cv01330
Plaintiff:
Jason Gould and Gould Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Zachary Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Booker v. Baird et al
as 5:2025cv00181
Plaintiff:
Kedrien Booker
Defendant:
Jenny Baird, Mary Martin, ., Donna Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Gould et al
as 5:2025cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kedrien Booker
Defendant:
Jason Gould, Santana Cook, Jonathan B. Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Brown et al
as 5:2025cv00154
Plaintiff:
Kedrien Booker
Defendant:
Andrea R. Brown, Leslie McQuinn, David Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Newsome et al
as 5:2025cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kedrien Booker
Defendant:
Tammie Newsome, Jason Gould, Beverly R. Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goulding v. Twin Med, LLC
as 8:2025cv02608
Plaintiff:
Jason Goulding
Defendant:
Twin Med, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
GOULD VENTURES, LLC et al v. COOLEY, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv09485
Defendant:
ALEXANDRA MAYHUGH, ESQ, DOES 1-20, MATT HALLIMAN, ESQ and others
Plaintiff:
GOULD VENTURES, LLC and JASON GOULD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earick v. Pickell et al
as 1:2023cv10032
Plaintiff:
Dylan John Earick
Defendant:
Robert Pickell, Christopher Swanson, Michael Tocarchick and others
Janice Brown v. Andrew Knapp, et al
as 22-1973
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANICE BROWN
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW KNAPP, KEN SINGLETON, BRYCE WILLOUGHBY and others
Defendant:
GENESEE COUNTY, MI, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
