Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sullivan, et al. v. Bannock County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Sullivan, Theodore James Sullivan, Robin Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Bannock County, Kootenai County, Elmore County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weston v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv04077
Defendant:
Ms. Gayle Wolfberger, Ms. Evans, Janson Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konecny v. Department of Assigned Counsel et al
as 3:2017cv05588
Plaintiff:
Devin Konecny
Defendant:
Department of Assigned Counsel and Jason Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aparicio et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2015cv01369
Plaintiff:
Jose Aparicio , Pedro Archuleta , Joseph Duran and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Tucker et al
as 5:2015cv01884
Plaintiff:
Keith Leonard Rogers
Defendant:
Susan Tucker, Jason Burns, Liton Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Ninneman et al
as 0:2014cv03458
Plaintiff:
Guy Israel Greene
Defendant:
Brian Ninneman, Jason Johnson, Tom Maciej and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckman v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eckman
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Governor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Swanson et al
as 0:2011cv03737
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Swanson et al
as 0:2011cv03712
Plaintiff:
Eugene Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Jesson et al
as 0:2011cv03429
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elmer Wills
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
