Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Summers v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jajuan Dontae Summers
Defendant:
Deputy Joel Williams, Deputy Jason Pittman, Louis Hall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67633
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Summers et al v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Joel Williams, Hinds County, Mississippi, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Summers, Jakiyah Summers, Aaliyah Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillman v. Pittman et al
as 1:2017cv00258
Plaintiff:
Albert Tillman
Defendant:
Jason Pittman and Schneider National Carriers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pittman v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JASON PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, KEVIN STEELE, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department and others
Defendant:
TERRY ZIEGLER, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, TERENCE HALL, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department and others
Henre et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Henre, Sr. and Wilma K. Henre
Defendant:
Jason Allen, William Bais, B. Bunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
