Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Soto v. Coweta County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Coweta County Sheriff's Office, Josh Joyner, Debra Found and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baltas v. Hardy et al
as 3:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Gail P. Hardy, Mathew C. Gedansky, James R. Turcotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv23339
Plaintiff:
JASON SOTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gasca v. City of Reno et al
as 3:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gasca
Defendant:
City of Reno, Jason Soto, Darin Balaam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv15651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Lawrence v. J. Castro, et al
as 18-15870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY M. LAWRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. CASTRO, I. MEADOWS, J. CHRISTENSEN and others
Lawrence v. Castro et al
as 3:2018cv00091
Defendant:
J. Castro, J. Christensen, I. Meadows and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Madrid Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc.
as 13-3873
Plaintiff:
Ousmane Diop, Forbes M. Lewis, Sanjeev Farid and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mani Jacob, Individually and on behalf of all others similary situated and Lesleena Mars, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Defendant - Appellant:
Duane Reade Holdings, Inc. and Duane Reade, Inc.
A'Gard v. Soto et al
as 1:2010cv07987
Plaintiff:
Kenith A'Gard
Defendant:
Jason Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
