Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wallace Jones v. USA, et al
as 21-5393
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE BREAUX, District Attorney, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of The District Court of Western Louisiana Civil Case 6:15-cv-01816, et al., STATE OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE JONES
Wallace Jones v. USA, et al
as 21-5028
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE BREAUX, District Attorney, STATE OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, JAMES D. CALDWELL, Attorney General and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of The District Court of Western Louisiana Civil Case 6:15-cv-01816, et al.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE JONES
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv02331
Defendant:
The State of Louisiana Office of the Attorney General, The Child Protective Service, Lafayette, Dantrell Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. JDC Masonry, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00462
Defendant:
Jerry A. Drain, JDC Masonry, Inc. and Tammy M. Drain
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13004
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMS Financial JDC, L. P. v. Menuck
as 2:2017cv13465
Plaintiff:
SMS Financial JDC, L. P.
Defendant:
Craig E. Menuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JDC Management, LLC v. Reich et al
as 1:2008cv00760
Plaintiff:
JDC Management, LLC
Defendant:
Tom Reich, Michael G. Petersen and Scott Bowen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
