Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MCVICKER v. CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02914
Plaintiff:
STANLEY K. MCVICKER
Defendant:
CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA, BEDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, LAWRENCE COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAUL v. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IN. et al
as 2:2019cv00073
Defendant:
U.S.P. TERRE HAUTE, IN., F.B.O.P. and SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IN.
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAUL v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 2:2013cv00304
Petitioner:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PAUL v. THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.
as 2:2012cv00120
Defendant:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA:TERRE HAUTE INDIANA and THE BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00029
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BANK & TRUST, AT&T, DEPT OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv00194
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BANK AND TRUST, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CLEARSYSTEMS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Defendant:
CHURCH, JOHN DOE(S), JOHN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION et al
as 2:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION and FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
