Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BEASLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20595
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BEASLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. WakeMed et al
as 5:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Erika Leigh Evans
Defendant:
WakeMed, Jeffrey Beasley, Michael Conerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Copeland v. Jordan et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Kevin Jordan, FNU McKree, FNU Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Marshall, et al v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 16-10726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL and JAMMORA ISHMAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY BEASLEY, Inspector General for The Florida Department of Corrections, individually and others
USA v. Jeffrey Beasley
as 15-2227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BEASLEY
Aubrey Land, et al v. Jeffrey Beasley, et al
as 15-11344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUBREY LAND, DAVID CLARK, DOUG GLISSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEASLEY, KENNETH SUMPTER, in their individual capacities, MELINDA MIGUEL, in their individual capacities and others
Hempstead v. Clark et al
as 3:2015cv00374
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Roland Clark, Cesar, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempstead v. Colon et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Colon, John Doe One, McGrutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Beasley, et al
as 2:2014mc51472
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beasley , Paul Stewart and Ronald Zajac
CASEY v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES
as 5:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, MICHAEL CREWS, JEFFREY BEASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
