Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Respondent:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 3:2022cv02371
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Defendant:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Respondent:
J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Uchiek et al
as 1:2021cv00415
Defendant:
Ted Uchiek, Jr., Lake-County Jail, John F. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al.
as 1:2019cv03248
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JEROME JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Nicholson
as 1:2018cv04078
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SunCoke Energy, Incorporated, et al v. Peggy Keltner, et al
as 15-8012
Petitioner:
SUNCOKE ENERGY, INCORPORATED, GATEWAY ENERGY & COKE COMPANY, LLC and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Respondent:
PEGGY KELTNER, JEROME JOHNSON, BEVERLY JOHNSON and others
Keltner et al v. SunCoke Energy, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01374
Plaintiff:
Peggy Keltner , Jerome Johnson , Beverly Johnson and others
Defendant:
SunCoke Energy, Inc. , Gateway Energy & Coke Company, LLC and United States Steel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerome Johnson v. Jane Doe, et al
as 11-2087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, Danville Correctional Center Dentist, H. GILL, Dental Assistant, WARDEN CALLOWAY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Johnson v. Kozeluh et al
as 1:2010cv08052
Plaintiff:
Jerome Johnson
Defendant:
Kozeluh and Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
