Cases 1 - 10 of 136
United States v. Joe Nichols
as 23-1465
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joe Lee Nichols
Roberts v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00693
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Joe Lee Roberts
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22921
Plaintiff:
JOE LEE BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Joe Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cardell Sanders, Jr. v. Genesee County, MI, et al
as 22-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARDELL SANDERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GENESEE COUNTY, MI, PAUL WALLACE, JAY PARKER and others
Curtis v. Hawaiian Mission Academy et al
as 1:2022cv00243
Defendant:
Rhonda L. Nelson, Hawaiian Mission Academy, Hawaii Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists and others
Plaintiff:
Kallie L. Curtis, Daniel J. Curtis and Nubia Lizeth Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HESTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04499
Plaintiff:
JOE LEE HESTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fulgham v. The City of Suffolk
as 2:2021cv00658
Petitioner:
Joe Lee Fulgham
Respondent:
Unnamed and The City of Suffolk Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
