Cases 11 - 19 of 19
USA v. Jose Torres-Duena
as 11-50287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE TORRES-DUENAS, also known as Joe Angel Torres, also known as Leonardo Duenia-Torres, also known as Leonard Torres, also known as Joe Torres
Cowser v. Obama et al
as 1:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Janis Cowser
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joe Bider, Thomas J. Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
TORRES et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv67037
Plaintiff:
FRANK JOE TORRES, FRANK JOE TORRES, ALICE B TORRES and others
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00227
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. Torres et al
as 3:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Joe Torres and Tony LaRussa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres et al v. Valencia County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 2:2007cv00328
Plaintiff:
Joe Torres, Joe Torres, Joe Torres and others
Defendant:
Valencia County Board of County Commissioners, Cornell Companies, Inc., Michael Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres et al v. Valencia County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 1:2007cv00328
Plaintiff:
Joe Torres, Joe Torres, Joe Torres and others
Defendant:
Valencia County Board of County Commissioners, Cornell Companies, Inc., Michael Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frank Joe Torres, et al. v. ACandS, Inc., et al.
as NM/1:02-CV-01222
Defendant:
ACandS, Inc
Plaintiff:
Frank Joe Torres
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
