Cases 21 - 30 of 860
Goodwin v. Collins
as 24-20061
Plaintiff:
John Allen Goodwin
Defendant:
Devon Collins and Jon or Jane Doe, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John Alexander, Jr.In re: John Alexander, Jr.
as 24-1093
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ALLEN ALEXANDER, JR.
Respondent:
JEFF HOWARD, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ricks (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
John Allen Ricks
Respondent:
Elias Higgins, Phillip J. Weiser and Elias Diggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricks (PS) v. Weiser et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Shanel Mossman, John Allen Ricks, Tiffany Ballain and others
Defendant:
Phillip J. Weiser, Governor Jared Polis and All County Jails and Courts of Colorado Statewide
Respondent:
Elias Diggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander #182285 v. Rewerts
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
John Allen Alexander #182285
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gao v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv07171
Plaintiff:
Qi Gao
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Merrick Garland and John Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
