Cases 31 - 40 of 53
John Ontjes v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 14-16058
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN ONTJES
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
John Gladden v. Blount County, et al
as 13-15044
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN GLADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
BLOUNT COUNTY, STATE OF ALABAMA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Russell v. People of the State of Colorado
as 1:2013cv01710
Petitioner:
John Allen Russell
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNES v. WRIGHT et al.
as 5:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
TROY A BARNES
Defendant:
WILLIAM L WRIGHT, JOHN ALLEN, CYNTHIA QUIVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Holland
as 6:2013cv00061
Petitioner:
John Allen Newton
Respondent:
J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Tutor v. Rick Angelozzi
as 12-35922
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN TUTOR
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK ANGELOZZI, Superintendent, Warner Creek Correctional Facility
John Gladden v. Blount County, et al
as 12-14666
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN GLADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
BLOUNT COUNTY, STATE OF ALABAMA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Gladden v. Blount County et al
as 2:2012cv01936
Petitioner:
John Allen Gladden
Respondent:
Blount County , State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ontjes v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv00696
Petitioner:
John Allen Ontjes
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sentell v. The State of Tennessee et al (TVV)
as 3:2012cv00045
Petitioner:
John Allen Sentell, Jr
Respondent:
The State of Tennessee and Loudon County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
